Words & Images


c>log
• An object is not so possessed of its name that one cannot find for it another which suits it better.

• There are objects which do without a name.

• A word sometimes only serves to designate itself.

• An object encounters its image, an object encounters its name.  It happens that the image and the
name of that object encounter each other.

• Sometimes the name of an object takes the place of an image.

• A word can take the place of an object in reality.

• An image can take the place of a word in a proposition.

• An object can imply that there are other objects behind it.

• Everything tends to make one think that there is little relation between an object and that which
    represents it.

• The words which serve to designate two different objects do not show what may distinguish
   those objects from one another.

• In a painting, the words are of the same substance as the images.

• One sees differently the images and the words in a painting.

• Any shape whatever may replace the image of an object.

• An object never performs the same function as its name or its image.

• The visible contours of objects in reality touch each other as if they formed a mosaic.

• Vague figures have a meaning as necessary and as perfect as precise ones.

• Sometimes, the names written in a painting designate precise things, and images vague things.

• Or, the contrary.












 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.